3.3.1 inorganische Compounds
Nitrate
What constitutes the health problem?
It arises from the presence of nitrite (NO₂⁻ anion) in food. This nitrite can:
  • In babies, block the blood's ability to carry oxygen, leading to "blue-baby syndrome." However, only a few such cases have been reported.
  • Be converted into nitrosamines in the mouth and stomach of certain individuals; nitrosamines have been identified as carcinogenic in animal experiments.
Where does this nitrite come from?
Nitrite occurs only to a limited extent freely in nature, as it is typically an intermediate stage in the conversion of nitrate. Sources include:
  • A component of curing salt (potassium and sodium nitrite).
  • A product of nitrate reduction in plant tissue under unfavorable conditions (e.g., dense packaging leading to anaerobic conditions, high temperature).
  • A product of nitrate reduction in the human body (a high pH is a prerequisite, occurring in the sick and in infants).
What are the sources of nitrate in the human diet, and what is their significance?
From the figure below, it becomes clear that vegetables and drinking water by far constitute the largest proportion of nitrate intake.
graphic
Therefore, it seems important:

    To limit the nitrate content in vegetables wherever possible, particularly in the diet of vulnerable groups (e.g., through limits for dietetic vegetables and baby food). Possible techniques include: reduced nitrogen fertilizer application, supplying plants with ammonium, monitoring and potentially rejecting specific batches, washing processes during food processing, and blending.

    To limit the nitrate content in drinking water. The current limit is 50 mg NO3 per liter (which corresponds to how many ppm of NO3-N?). These limits are generally adhered to. However, there have been and continue to be exceptions:
    • In areas of very intensive livestock farming with large quantities of slurry,
    • After grassland is plowed up,
    • Following legume cultivation,
    • After heavy rainfall, localized leaching events can occur in the landscape ("hot spots"). This is more likely the lighter the soil texture is. This contaminates the groundwater.
However, scientific studies clearly show that the life expectancy for groups of people who consume large quantities of vegetables (and fruit) is higher. The classic example is Japanese women, who have a very high average life expectancy despite a very high consumption of vegetables.
The figure below shows an example of the change in soil water concentration after grassland is plowed up.
graphic

What is water used for in a private household? Where does this water come from?graphic
The figure above shows that food preparation accounts for only a very small portion of a household's water consumption. Approximately two-thirds of this water comes from groundwater.
My opinion: It is actually absurd to purify 100% of wastewater to drinking water quality in treatment plants when only 3% is used for food purposes.
Further problems associated with nitrogen:
  • Denitrification and the threat to the ozone layer by N2O.
  • Production of ammonium in livestock facilities and wastewater treatment plants.
  • Acidification of soils and damage to trees
Phosphate
In streams and lakes, phosphate input may lead to eutrophication because it is the nutrient element that limits algal growth. When detergents still contained phosphates, this was the primary cause of eutrophication in rivers and lakes.
Phosphate is supplied in fertilizers with varying solubilities. However, after a relatively short period, this phosphate is precipitated and/or adsorbed onto soil particles. With few exceptions, phosphate therefore can be leached towards groundwater with soil water very slowly. However, it may very well enter surface waters through transport with soil particles (wind and water erosion).
This issue can be addressed by limiting erosion, for example by:
    • Maintaining continuous soil cover with plants or plant residues,
    • Avoiding cultivation on steeply sloping land, etc.
Heavy Metals
Heavy metals are ubiquitous, meaning they are found everywhere. They are a natural component of both pristine and agriculturally/horticulturally managed soils. From the perspective of food quality and the environment, a clear distinction must be made within heavy metals between:
  • Essential and beneficial heavy metals, whose supply is desirable when availability is insufficient: Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo. Potential contamination primarily arises from Zn and Cu (Zn from pig farming, Cu also from the application of copper-containing fungicides)
  • Non-essential, potentially toxic heavy metals, such as Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Mercury (Hg), and Lead (Pb).
Example of harmful effects: Itai-Itai Disease (Ouch- Ouch Disease), a case of cadmium poisoning that became known in 1955. Cadmium-contaminated mine wastewater from the Mitsui corporation entered the irrigation system of Japanese rice fields. Consumption of the contaminated rice caused apathy, severe pain in the back and thighs, kidney damage, bone fractures, and bone softening. 100 people died.
Nutrient deficiency was likely a contributing cause. This is inferred because the consumption of highly cadmium- contaminated (173 ppm) and zinc-contaminated (57,600 ppm) oysters (Crassostrea gigas) from the Derwent Estuary in Tasmania caused nausea and vomiting; however, there is no evidence there of permanent health damage from eating cadmium-contaminated fish or other seafood. With the exception of some shellfish, seafood generally contains no more cadmium than other foods and therefore does not pose a particular health risk.
Heavy metals are particularly problematic because:
  • The accumulation phase can be long before harmful effects appear.
  • The harmful effect cannot be reliably predicted based on soil content alone. Soil and plant factors play a role (e.g., fungi generally accumulate more heavy metals than higher plants).
  • Once toxicity thresholds are exceeded, significant, difficult-to-remedy damage to plants and impairments to food quality occur.
  • Accumulation is nearly impossible to reverse (in recent times, "phytoremediation" using hyperaccumulating plants is being discussed).
Fertilizers contain heavy metals:
  • Cadmium is a component of phosphate fertilizers. The origins of raw phosphate rock differ in their cadmium content. The lowest levels are found in Kola apatite (Russian Peninsula); intermediate levels are found in sources from Morocco and the USA. During the processing of raw phosphates (acid digestion), the cadmium remains and cannot be removed with reasonable effort. Generally, the input of cadmium via fertilizers exceeds its removal from the field with harvested crops (the offtake), leading to an inevitable accumulation in the soil with phosphorus fertilization.
  • Organic single-nutrient fertilizers (e.g., bone meal, guano, grape marc) also contain heavy metals. The variation in content, due to different origins, is at least as great as that found in organic-mineral fertilizers.
Siehe auch
Ferrtilizer Costs
Commercial horticulture is characterized by:
  • Very high land-use intensity (e.g., multiple cycles of vegetables, ornamental plants under glass)
  • Very high quality requirements from trade and consumers
  • High adherence to schedules
  • High resource input (labor, energy)
  • High profit expectation per unit area
This leads, among other things, to minimizing the risk of crop failure, and cost-saving measures are only implemented where costs are high relative to total expenses. The table below illustrates, for example, that fertilization constitutes only a small portion of the total cost. For business management reasons, it is therefore understandable (though not acceptable) that saving on fertilizer is considered a secondary priority, as it increases the risk of crop failure without significantly improving the business outcome.
Fertilizer and Plant Protection Product Expenditure in Outdoor Vegetable Cultivation (Federal Republic of Germany)
 
1979/80
1981/82
1983/84
1985/86
Business Result (BR) DM ha-1
40682
42284
40606
38866
Fertilizer Costs, DM ha-1
1489
1752
1846
1698
Fertilizer Costs rel to BR
0.037
0.041
0.046
0.044
Plant Protection Products, DM ha-1
481
595
642
667
Plant Protection Products rel. to BR
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.17
Agrarberichte LWK Rheinland